Gone Fission
The science behind nuclear power was first developed in the
late 1800s. During WWII the focus of scientists in the field was to create and
develop the atomic bomb. However, since that time, focus has been on the
development of nuclear power as a source of electricity generation (World Nuclear Association 2013).
Due to climate change, nuclear energy has been the subject of much debate over
the last decade or so. The period has even been described as the ‘Nuclear
Renaissance’ (Marshall 2005).
Figure 1 - Map of UK Nuclear Sites |
Nuclear power has been
subject to much criticism throughout its history, in no small part due to
disasters such as Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011.
Disasters such as these have led to widespread scepticism and have hindered the
development of nuclear power in many countries, including our own. The UK has fallen behind other countries such as France in terms
of nuclear power production. The two countries have very similar populations
but in 2012, France produced
405 billion kilowatt hours of nuclear energy compared to the UK ’s 64 (NEI 2013).
Figure 1 (UK Government 2013) is a map showing the UK ’s
nuclear sites. The new build site at Hinkley
Point C
has been criticised in the news recently as some believe the power generated
will be too expensive (BBC 2013).
Aside from the fact that nuclear power stations have been
the (very) occasional cause of meltdown disasters, nuclear power is relatively
environmentally friendly compared to coal, oil and gas powered stations. Figure 2 (UK Government 2006)
shows the CO₂ emissions per kilowatt
hours for several energy sources. Notice that the carbon footprint of nuclear
is negligible when compared with those of coal and gas and is as small as hydro
power and wind power. Due to the nature of nuclear fuels such as uranium,
disposal of waste fuel can be a tricky business. I won’t get into this in huge
detail here but I have included a link at the bottom of the page in case anyone
is interested on how this is done.
Figure 2 - Bar chart showing relative carbon footprints of several fuel sources |
I believe that nuclear power will need to play a substantial
role in the future production of the UK ’s energy. I could well see
nuclear energy acting as a like for like replacement for coal, oil and gas
fuelled plants as it boasts a constant supply of energy. I feel that potential
hazards such as waste disposal can be avoided by appropriate management. The
threat of a nuclear disaster will however, remain lodged in many people’s
minds. Nuclear energy is an asset that we need to take advantage of but do so
with extreme caution. The development of new fuels (see Thorium post) and
techniques such as fusion may well hold the key to unlocking the full potential
of nuclear power.
The link to waste disposal info is here,
Thanks for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment